Public Opinion and the Abolition or Retention of the Death Penalty Why is the United States Different?
نویسندگان
چکیده
What explains the difference between the United States and the many other countries that have abolished capital punishment? Because the United States and many other nations that have abolished the death penalty are democracies, there seems to be an obvious answer: abolition or retention reflects the preferences of the electorate. According to this view, the U.S. electorate is simply more punitive, and the question becomes explaining the difference in national attitudes. There is some truth to this explanation. As I have argued elsewhere, the U.S. public generally does favor punitive criminal justice policies. 1 But that cannot be the whole story. Other nations have abolished capital punishment despite widespread public support—in many cases, support of more than 70 percent of the public at the time of abolition. In the United States, however, after the Supreme Court imposed a de facto moratorium on capital punishment in the early 1970s, strong public support led to its reintroduction in two-thirds of the states.
منابع مشابه
جایگاه روش های نوین کیفر سالب حیات در حقوق ایران
Abstract Despite the movement for abolishing capital punishment, several countries have been bound to these punishments. In recent decades, however, the way how to reduce the agony resulting from execution of capital penalty has been the center of focus with criminal policymakers these countries; an issue which led the legislator of the United States to substitute hanging by death by electro...
متن کاملInvestigating the administrative structure of the board of trustees of the United States of America Public Libraries in order to provide a model for use in public library associations of Iran
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the administrative structure of the board of trustees of the United States of America Public Libraries in order to provide a model for use in public library associations of Iran. Methodology: The present study is an applied research and is a quantitative and qualitative content analysis in term of metodology. To answer research questions ...
متن کاملOn Why the United States Should Not Attack Iran: A Conservative, Evangelical Christian Response
In the midst of American intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in the aftermath of the presidential election in Iran, support for American involvement in Iran has increased in some circles. In this piece, our desire is to give a conservative, evangelical Christian response to why America should not support any military action against Iran. A position advocated by many of us is “Just War.” I...
متن کاملIntroduction: the Death Penalty in America
Though several state legislatures have considered bills to eliminate the death penalty in the past decade, New Jersey stands alone as the first state to legislatively abolish the death penalty in over thirty years. What factors enabled the New Jersey legislature to successfully pass legislation that abolished the death penalty? To answer this question, I conduct a qualitative case study of the ...
متن کاملPublic Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal
Health services and policy research (HSPR) represent a multidisciplinary field which integrates knowledge from health economics, health policy, health technology assessment, epidemiology, political science among other fields, to evaluate decisions in health service delivery. Health service decisions are informed by evidence at the clinical, organizational, and policy level, levels with distinct...
متن کامل